PL EN
RESEARCH PAPER
Chemical pollution of environment in the cities of Central Siberia: risk for the health of the population
 
More details
Hide details
1
State Pedagogical University named after V.P. Astafiev, Krasnoyarsk, Russia
 
 
Corresponding author
Ludmila Klimatskaya   

Lenin Street 118-37 Krasnoyarsk 660017, Russia
 
 
Med Srod. 2015;18(1):12-17
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
This article will deal with environmental pollution in cities including the problem of risk assessment. The aim of the study is to determine carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks for the health of the population due to chemical contamination of air, water and food in the cities of the Krasnoyarsk region.

Material and Methods:
The research was conducted in the Center of Hygiene and Epidemiology in the Krasnoyarsk region. 5122 samples of air, 4863 samples of water and 6915 samples of food stuff have been analyzed. Concentration of chemical substances was the base on which individual carcinogenesis risk (ICR) and population carcinogenic conventional risks (PCCR) and non carcinogenic risks [1] have been calculated. In the industrial cities chemical pollution of air, water and food stuff including carcinogenic substances creates carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks of morbidity of the population with the reinforcement of the complex impact, “with” which greatly exceeds the maximum acceptable risks.

Results:
Chemical pollution of environmental facilities in cities of the Krasnoyarsk region produce complex carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks which exceed maximum limit. The greatest shares in structure of complex carcinogenic risks are made in food stuff and water consumption in structure of complex non-carcinogenic risks as a result of air pollution and food stuff pollution.

Conclusions:
Obtained data could be used to set priorities in preventive measures to preserve health of the population in industrial cities of the Krasnoyarsk region.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
staff of the Medical Service of the Krasnoyarsk Territory for the material.
FUNDING
Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare.
 
REFERENCES (12)
1.
Guidelines for risk assessment for public health under the influence of chemical pollutants in the environment. Moscow 2004.
 
2.
 
3.
Top Ten Toxic Threats in 2013: Cleanup, Progress, and Ongoing Challenges, Nov. 4, 2013, New York, NY – Blacksmith Institute and Green Cross Switzerland. Available on: www.worstpolluted.org [10.08.2014].
 
4.
2010 All-Russia Population Census. Federal State Statistics Service. Retrieved June 29, 2012.
 
5.
EPA, 2007. Available on: http://www.epa.gov/wed/pages/p... archive 2003/allen-gil03.htm [10.08.2014].
 
6.
Zenkov V.A.: Hygienic problems Kuzbass mining towns. Sciences, Moscow 2000.
 
7.
Revich B.: Environmental pollution and public health. Introduction to Environmental Epidemiology. MNEPU, Moscow 2001.
 
8.
Bobkov T.E.: Zoning perspective building using risk assessment methodology to public health. J. Hygiene and Sanitation 2009, 6: 38-40.
 
9.
Shashin T.A., Novikov S.M., Kozlov A.V. et al.: Evaluation of health risk due to exposure to emissions from aluminum production. J. Hygiene and Sanitation 2006, 5: 61-64.
 
10.
Zaitsev V.I., Mihayluts A.P.: Hygienic assessment of environmental pollution with long-term use of concentrated chemical enterprises. Chronicle, Kemerovo 2001.
 
11.
Surzhikov V.D., Surzhikov D.V.: Assessment and management of risk to public health from environmental pollution multicomponent major center of metallurgy. J. Hygiene and Sanitation. 2006, 5: 32-35.
 
12.
Environment and human health Joint EEA-JRC report No 5/2013. Available on: http://www.eea.europa.eu/publi... [10.08.2014].
 
eISSN:2084-6312
ISSN:1505-7054
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top